A single-donor proof-of-concept single-cell analysis maps heterogeneous differentiation trajectories toward cartilage-like states in human urine-derived stem cells.

backgroundUrine-derived stem cells (USCs) represent an accessible and non-invasive cell source with reported chondrogenic differentiation potential. However, the cellular heterogeneity and transcriptional dynamics underlying USC differentiation remain incompletely understood, limiting their translational interpretation.

methodsWe combined functional differentiation assays with single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize USC differentiation at both phenotypic and transcriptional levels. Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation were assessed using histological staining, quantitative PCR, and three-dimensional spheroid cultures. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis was performed on integrated datasets of undifferentiated and differentiated USCs, followed by pseudotime trajectory inference and mapping to a human cartilage reference atlas.

resultsChondrogenic induction resulted in reproducible acquisition of cartilage-associated features, including glycosaminoglycan-rich extracellular matrix deposition, increased expression of SOX9, and formation of aggrecan-positive spheroids. In this donor, single-cell analysis mapped an inferred differentiation trajectory from proliferative states towards differentiated populations, although the fine-grained pseudotemporal ordering was sensitive to analytical choices and is therefore interpreted qualitatively. Along this inferred trajectory, we identified a candidate transient transcriptional state associated with elevated CDH1 expression and epithelial-like aggregation features. Probabilistic mapping to a human cartilage reference atlas indicated that overall mapping confidence was low (median prediction score 0.34) and that only a minority of cells showed confident transcriptional similarity (prediction score ≥ 0.5) to mature/articular cartilage-associated reference states (7.8% of all cells and 17.6% of chondrogenically induced cells). This confident similarity was concentrated in a few clusters at the differentiated end of the trajectory rather than representing the bulk of the culture, and label-transfer confidence was not equated with chondrocyte identity. Despite this enrichment, differentiated populations exhibited transcriptional heterogeneity, including subsets of cells associated with hypertrophic, fibrocartilage-like, and contractile gene programmes, indicating the presence of multiple differentiation trajectories.

conclusionsThis single-donor proof-of-concept study suggests that USC differentiation may involve a candidate transient, aggregation-associated transcriptional state accompanied by CDH1 expression and gives rise to heterogeneous lineage-associated outcomes, with only a minority of cells acquiring confident transcriptional similarity to mature cartilage. Because these observations derive from one donor, they should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and require validation across independent donors before donor-independent or translational conclusions for cartilage regeneration can be drawn. These findings nonetheless provide a single-cell resolution framework for future multi-donor validation of USC differentiation and its inherent transcriptional heterogeneity.