Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587413›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Incomplete Spoiling Correction for 3D

Gabriela Belsley, Damian J Tyler, Matthew D Robson, Elizabeth M Tunnicliffe

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriela BelsleyOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-2340
Damian J TylerOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthew D RobsonOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-1012
Elizabeth M TunnicliffeOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)Medical Research Council EP/L016052/1NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssess the impact of incomplete spoiling and spatial saturation on

methodsA correction factor, derived from extended phase graph simulations, was applied to the measured SPGR signal to account for deviations from the theoretical steady-state signal. An iterative fitting process was used, refining the incomplete spoiling correction factor at each step based on the updated

resultsWithout a correction, the median

conclusionA correction for incomplete spoiling is essential to achieve an accurate measure of

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsHumansPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity3Dextended‐phase‐graphsincomplete spoilingsteady‐state

Identifiers

PMID42587413
PMCPMC13619879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.