ArticleThe oncologist2026
Immunohistochemistry-based molecular subtypes and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: a chemotherapy-only cohort.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically heterogeneous, aggressive disease where immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based algorithms, defining luminal androgen receptor (LAR), immunomodulatory (IM), basal-like immunosuppressed (BLIS), mesenchymal (MES), and unclassifiable (UC) subtypes, offer a pragmatic alternative to transcriptomics. This study evaluated clinical trajectories and survival outcomes associated with IHC-based molecular subtypes and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) across distinct subgroups.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 289 women with TNBC treated with chemotherapy-only regimens analyzed molecular subtypes across four clinical groups: non-recurrent, recurrent, progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and de novo metastatic disease. IHC-based subclassification included androgen receptor (AR), CD8, FOXC1, and DCLK1 biomarkers. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsThe cohort included non-recurrent (43.9%), recurrent (26.3%), neoadjuvant progressors (11.5%), and de novo stage IV (18.3%) cases. IM subtype (16.3%) was enriched in non-recurrent cases with the highest median sTILs levels (20.0%). BLIS (26.3%) and UC (39.4%) subtypes predominated in recurrent and metastatic disease, while MES subtype (9.0%) predominated in neoadjuvant chemotherapy progressors. In early-stage disease, sTILs ≥10% independently predicted superior OS (HR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.40-1.0; P = .049), showing no prognostic role in the de novo stage IV group. Molecular subtypes lost independent significance in multivariable models.
conclusionsClinicopathological factors and sTILs remain primary prognostic determinants in TNBC. Although IHC-based molecular subtypes were not independent survival predictors, their differential clinical distribution validates their biological relevance to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities, and to guide precision medicine and de-escalation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.