ReviewNutrients2026
Association Between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) and Head and Neck Cancer Incidence-A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) comprises a heterogeneous group of tumours, most often of squamous cell origin, characterized by both high morbidity and mortality rates. It is the seventh most common form of cancer diagnosed in humans, accounting for approximately 4.7% of all cancers. Among HNCs, neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is predicted to become the most common form of human cancer. Some sources include oesophagus (ESCC) in this group due to their similar histology, being described as upper aerodigestive tract cancers (UADT). Unfortunately, 60-70% of cases are diagnosed late, i.e., at clinical stages III-IV. As a result, despite modern surgical techniques and oncological treatments, the survival rate remains below 40-60% due to frequent lymph node metastases and local tumour recurrence. There is a growing concern that diet and inflammatory dietary components may influence the initiation and development of HNSCC. The inflammatory potential of diets can be quantified by the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). The DII was derived from an analysis of 45 dietary constituents that either increase or decrease inflammation. Several recent clinical studies have noted a significant relationship between DII score and many inflammation-associated chronic diseases, such as obesity, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, and diabetes, and the incidence of various human cancers, i.e., prostate, ovarian, breast, colorectal cancer, and HNC. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between DII and HNSCC, with most being limited to observational, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review is to present the substantial oncological aspects of DII, discuss the use of DII and its modification, the Energy-Adjusted Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII), as indicators of HNSCC risk. It also introduces key diet-induced pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms and the cellular molecular signalling pathways determining the carcinogenesis of HNSCC. It provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature, including key opinion-forming systematic reviews, as well as molecular, observational, cross-sectional and case-control studies, all of which are accessible via scholarly databases such as PubMed/EMBASE/Web of Science. Thus, the work serves as a compendium of up-to-date knowledge on the relationship between DII/ED-II score and HNSCC etiopathogenesis and the influence of a diet-induced persistent inflammatory microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.