ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Effect of Hybrid Convective-Infrared-Ultrasonic Drying on Selected Properties of Kale and Nutritional Value of Kale Bars.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the content of biocompounds and the nutrient composition of dried kale (with/without blanching) and bars containing it (fresh/dried). Kale leaves and bars were dried using convection (CD), convection-infrared-ultrasonic (HD), and freeze-drying (FD) methods to obtain potential snacks. The bar recipe consisted of 20% fresh kale (plus 30% water) or 10% dried kale (plus 40% water), 20% dried dates, 10% coconut flour, 10% flaxseed, and 10% hemp protein. Dried blanched kale contained from 524 to 618 mg of GAE/100 g d.m., which was 6.8-12.4% more than in unblanched kale, but about four times less in the bars. Similarly, blanched kale had a higher content of chlorophyll A + B and carotenoids. Both of these groups of compounds in blanched kale dried using the HD method were comparable to or slightly higher than in the raw material (approx. 932 and 174 mg/100 g d.m. of chlorophyll A + B and carotenoids, respectively), while in the bars their content was low, 34-64 and 7.6-13.2 mg/100 g d.m., respectively. The caloric content of the bars ranged from 325 to 348 kcal/100 g (1356 to 1452 kJ/100 g of product). Dried kale has proven to be a valuable snack due to its antioxidant content. In turn, the bars were rich in nutrients such as protein (approx. 14.4%), fat (approx. 9.3%), minerals (approx. 4.0%), carbohydrates (approx. 35.2%), and especially fiber (approx. 27.3%), which allows them to be classified as "high-fiber" products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.