ReviewBiology2026
Cell-Based Therapies for Cardiac and Vascular Regeneration in Cardiovascular Disease: Recent Advances, Translational Barriers, and Future Directions.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the foremost cause of death globally, responsible for 19.2 million deaths and 437 million disability-adjusted life years in 2023, with prevalent cases having more than doubled since 1990. No approved therapy restores myocardium lost to infarction. The adult heart replaces cardiomyocytes at approximately 1% per year in young adults, declining to about 0.45% per year with ageing, far below what is needed to recover the more than one billion cells destroyed by a large myocardial infarction. Cell-based regenerative strategies have been investigated for more than two decades, encompassing bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs), mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), cardiac progenitor cells, cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs), skeletal myoblasts, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs). Safety has been consistent. Efficacy has been modest and variable: the CADUCEUS trial demonstrated scar mass reduction with CDCs without proportionate ejection fraction improvement; the Phase 1/2 POSEIDON trial confirmed MSC safety in 30 patients; and the Phase 3 DREAM-HF trial, enrolling 537 patients, failed its primary endpoint (HR 1.2,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.