Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589281›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Current Approaches and Emerging Strategies in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Anna Alyasova, Kanamat Efendiev, Igor Reshetov, Dinara Ilyasova, Olga Shpileva, Victor Loschenov, Vladimir Makarov, Evgenia Zakharova, Pavel Karalkin, Yulia Agakina and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anna AlyasovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Kanamat EfendievDepartment of Medical Photonics, Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5864-1172
Igor ReshetovDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Dinara IlyasovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-7003
Olga ShpilevaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Victor LoschenovDepartment of Medical Photonics, Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-2367
Vladimir MakarovDepartment of Medical Photonics, Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9622-1550
Evgenia ZakharovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Therapy and Radiology, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 603005 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Pavel KaralkinDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Yulia AgakinaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Aida GilyadovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Vadim CheremisovDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey StetsiukDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Alim NebezhevDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Polina KozlovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Aminat AtaevaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina RostislavovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Valeria SudarkinaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Artem ShiryaevDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Reconstructive Surgery, Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 25-75-10156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common, prognostically unfavorable manifestation of advanced gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies whose treatment is constrained by the blood-peritoneal barrier, which limits drug penetration even when cytoreductive surgery is combined with systemic chemotherapy. This review evaluates current intraperitoneal treatment modalities and emerging technologies for overcoming this limitation, based on recent clinical trials and meta-analyses identified through Scopus and PubMed. We sequentially examine conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC); hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian, gastric, and colorectal cancers, with attention to patient selection and the peritoneal cancer index as determinants of survival benefit; pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) and its electrostatic precipitation variant (ePIPAC); and photodynamic and photothermal therapy for tumor treatment. Novel strategies are also discussed, including IPC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, optical dosimetry, and nanomedicine-based drug delivery as tools for improving treatment precision. Overall, management of PC is transitioning toward a personalized, multimodal approach: HIPEC and PIPAC provide standardized platforms for regional therapy, but future progress depends on integrating advanced drug delivery systems, immunotherapy, and real-time intraoperative monitoring, with standardization of protocols through large multicenter trials remaining a priority for translating these modalities into clinical practice.

Indexed as

CarcinomaPeritoneal NeoplasmsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPhotochemotherapyPressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol ChemotherapyAntineoplastic Agentschemoresistancecytoreductive surgeryelectrostatic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapyhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsnanomedicineperitoneal carcinomatosisphotodynamic therapyphotothermal therapypressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42589281
PMCPMC13466377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.