ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Phylogeography of Bone Metastasis: Clonal Evolution, Skeletal Niche Adaptation, and Clinical Implications.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone metastasis is often treated clinically as a late complication of advanced cancer, yet accumulating evidence indicates that it is also a spatial evolutionary process shaped by clonal selection, niche adaptation, dormancy, and reseeding. This review examines BoM through a phylogeographic framework that links tumor ancestry with anatomical location and time. We discuss how heterogeneous primary tumors generate bone-tropic subclones, how circulating tumor cells pass through dissemination bottlenecks, and how disseminated tumor cells enter perivascular and endosteal niches that either maintain dormancy or support early micrometastatic outgrowth. We then compare clonal architectures across breast, prostate, lung, and renal cell carcinomas, emphasizing both lineage-specific programs and convergent bone-adaptive states, including osteomimicry, immune evasion, metabolic plasticity, and epigenetic remodeling. Methodological platforms such as multiregion sequencing, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, lineage tracing, and liquid biopsy are evaluated with attention to the technical limitations imposed by mineralized tissue. Finally, we consider how bone lesions may function as reservoirs for secondary dissemination and how evolutionary thinking could improve biomarker development, dormancy prediction, trial design, and therapy selection. Viewing BoM as an evolving ecosystem may help shift the field from reactive skeletal management toward earlier, biology-informed intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.