Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589541›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

On the Edge of Benefit and Harm: Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer.

Anna B Nikiforova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna B NikiforovaInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino 142290, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4095-6560

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 26-15-00651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are central regulators of cancer biology and represent a double-edged target in oncology. At physiological levels, ROS support signal transduction, proliferation, differentiation, and immune responses, whereas sustained ROS imbalance promotes DNA damage, genomic instability, metabolic reprogramming, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment, thereby contributing to tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Conversely, because many cancer cells operate close to the limit of tolerable oxidative stress, further ROS elevation can trigger apoptosis, ferroptosis, immunogenic cell death, and other cytotoxic programs. This review summarizes the major intracellular and microenvironmental sources of ROS, the mechanisms by which redox signaling shapes malignant transformation and tumor adaptation, and the antioxidant systems that buffer oxidative stress in cancer cells. We further discuss current therapeutic approaches based on both ROS suppression and ROS amplification, including redox-modulating small molecules, radiotherapy, photodynamic and sonodynamic therapy, catalytic nanomaterials, and ROS-responsive prodrugs and drug delivery systems. Particular attention is given to the context-dependent effects of ROS, the antioxidant paradox, tumor heterogeneity, hypoxia, off-target toxicity, and the need for robust redox biomarkers. A deeper understanding of tumor-specific redox vulnerabilities will be essential for developing precise and clinically effective ROS-oriented cancer therapies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnimalsAntioxidantsApoptosisHumansOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentAntioxidantsReactive Oxygen Speciesantioxidant defenseapoptosiscarcinogenesismetastasismitochondriaoxidative stressreactive oxygen species (ROS)redox signalingtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42589541
PMCPMC13467102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.