ArticlePolymers2026
Mechanical Durability of Polymer-Encapsulated Electronic Yarns for Electronic Textile Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a standalone yarn-level assessment of the mechanical and functional durability of polymer-encapsulated electronic yarns (E-yarns) for wearable electronic textile applications. The investigated E-yarns consisted of miniaturised electronic components soldered onto fine conductive wires, protected by polymer encapsulation, and enclosed within braided textile yarn structures. This heterogeneous architecture enables textile-compatible functionality but creates local regions that may be susceptible to damage under various deformation modes. E-yarns incorporating light-emitting diode, photodiode, and resistor components were evaluated under cyclic bending fatigue, torsional fatigue, quasi-static tensile loading, and wash durability conditions. Electrical measurements were used to monitor functional degradation and failure, while X-ray imaging, scanning electron microscopy and finite element analysis were used to examine structural damage, failure localisation, fracture surface morphology, and local stress and strain distribution. The results show that E-yarn durability depended on the imposed loading condition, with distinct mechanical and functional responses observed across the different test modes. The polymer-encapsulated region emerged as a mechanically important feature of the E-yarn architecture, particularly at transitions between encapsulated and non-encapsulated regions. By addressing multiple deformation and loading conditions at the standalone yarn level, this work provides a systematic reliability assessment of polymer-encapsulated E-yarns, enabling intrinsic failure mechanisms to be distinguished from textile integration effects and supporting the development of more reliable yarn-based electronic textiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.