Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589922›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Popliteal Plexus Block as a Potential Alternative to IPACK Block in Total-Knee Arthroplasty: Anatomical Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Ergonomic Advantages.

Sung Jun Kim, Siwook Chung, Jae Hoo Park, Hye Joo Yun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sung Jun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0156-7829
Siwook ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-7235
Jae Hoo ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon 21431, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-5045-4366
Hye Joo YunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-6960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total-knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with substantial acute postoperative pain. While the adductor canal block (ACB) is widely used to provide motor-sparing anterior knee analgesia, effective management of posterior knee pain remains an important clinical challenge. The infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block was developed to address posterior capsular pain but may be associated with technical and ergonomic limitations. More recently, the popliteal plexus block (PPB) has emerged as a novel motor-sparing alternative. This narrative review summarizes the anatomical basis, current clinical evidence, and practical considerations of combining the ACB with the PPB, with particular emphasis on its potential role as an alternative to the IPACK block within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. Current anatomical and early clinical evidence suggests that the PPB selectively targets the terminal articular branches around the adductor hiatus while preserving the major motor nerve trunks. Available randomized clinical trials indicate that the PPB provides analgesia comparable to IPACK while maintaining motor function, with additional practical advantages including shorter procedural time and, in individual studies, reduced postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea. Overall, the combined ACB and PPB approach appears to be a promising motor-sparing strategy for perioperative analgesia after TKA. However, the current evidence is derived predominantly from cadaveric studies, early-phase randomized trials, and single-center clinical investigations. Therefore, larger multicenter studies with longer follow-ups are needed to establish its long-term efficacy, safety, and role relative to the established IPACK technique.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgeryIPACK blockmotor-sparing regional anesthesiapopliteal plexus blocktotal-knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42589922
PMCPMC13467061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.