ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Early Precise Prediction and Severe Risk Stratification of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: Advances and Future Directions in Clinical Translation from Traditional Models to Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Omics Technologies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a liver disorder unique to pregnancy, closely associated with severe adverse maternal and fetal outcomes such as preterm birth and intrauterine fetal death. Its pathogenesis involves a complex interplay of genetic, hormonal, metabolic, and environmental factors, with a higher risk observed in southern China and among individuals co-infected with hepatitis B virus. Substantial evidence demonstrates a significant dose-response relationship between serum total bile acid (TBA) levels and perinatal outcomes, with TBA ≥ 40 μmol/L commonly used as a criterion for severe ICP. However, most existing prediction models are based on single-center, retrospective studies with small sample sizes and insufficient external validation, limiting their clinical generalizability. In recent years, nomograms and machine learning methods have demonstrated advantages in the early prediction and risk stratification of ICP. Deep learning models and multi-omics integration strategies have further enhanced predictive accuracy. Nevertheless, challenges remain regarding model interpretability, data standardization, and cross-population applicability. Future research should leverage large-scale, multi-center prospective cohorts, integrating multi-omics technologies, including genomics, metabolomics, gut microbiome profiling with artificial intelligence to develop clinically actionable and interpretable risk prediction tools. Integrating these tools into electronic health record systems and mobile platforms may facilitate the early identification and individualized management of ICP, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.