ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Sarcopenia and Walking Recovery in Older Adults: A Mini-Review of Evidence and Rehabilitation Implications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Walking recovery is a central goal of geriatric rehabilitation, but it is shaped by multiple interacting factors rather than by muscle impairment alone. This mini-review examines whether sarcopenia-related weakness, low muscle quality, and reduced physical reserve identify a clinically important vulnerability phenotype relevant to delayed gait recovery in older adults after hospitalization, hip fracture, surgery, or cardiac procedures. We summarize current consensus definitions of sarcopenia, explain why muscle strength and physical performance are often more clinically informative than muscle mass alone, and review the mechanistic pathways that may connect sarcopenia with impaired walking, including anabolic resistance, inflammation, disuse, neuromuscular remodeling, trunk weakness, and cognitive-emotional modifiers. Across community, orthogeriatric, post-acute, and cardiac rehabilitation settings, sarcopenia markers are generally associated with slower gait or poorer attained mobility; however, findings for change in mobility are inconsistent, and most available studies are observational, heterogeneous, or indirect. Sarcopenia should therefore be interpreted as one potential marker of reduced reserve and mobility risk rather than as a determinant of walking recovery or evidence that sarcopenia-aware rehabilitation improves outcomes. Future work should use more consistent diagnostic frameworks and test whether a sarcopenia-aware rehabilitation integrating early strength assessment, individualized nutrition care, and multicomponent gait rehabilitation improve walking outcomes in medically complex older adults beyond current standards of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.