ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Motor-Sparing Regional Analgesia in Frail and Sarcopenic Older Adults Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: From Anatomy to Clinical Decision-Making-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly performed in older adults, a population with a growing prevalence of frailty and sarcopenia. Analgesic strategies focused mainly on pain reduction may overlook mobility, functional independence, fall prevention, and delirium risk, making motor preservation a central goal of perioperative care. This narrative review examines the anatomical basis, clinical evidence, and practical application of motor-sparing regional analgesia for older adults undergoing TKA, with emphasis on frailty, sarcopenia, and mobility-centred recovery, synthesising current evidence on established, emerging, and experimental techniques. Evidence was classified as geriatric-specific, older-enriched mixed-age, or mixed-age adult. Most technique-specific evidence derives from cohorts that included younger adults; only two small randomised trials reported cohorts composed exclusively of patients aged ≥65 years, and no regional-analgesia trial stratified outcomes by frailty or sarcopenia. A pragmatic clinical decision framework was developed to support individualised strategy selection in frail and sarcopenic patients. Current evidence supports adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia as the foundation of motor-sparing analgesia after TKA; supplementary techniques such as iPACK, popliteal plexus block, genicular nerve block, and anterior femoral cutaneous nerve block may further optimise sensory coverage while preserving quadricep strength, whereas femoral nerve block produces predictable motor impairment and appears less suitable for this population. The existing literature remains largely focused on pain scores and opioid consumption, while mobility-related outcomes are infrequently reported. Direct evidence for falls, near-falls, delirium, discharge destination, functional independence, and long-term mobility remains sparse or absent. Successful analgesia after TKA should be defined not only by pain relief but by preservation of mobility and functional recovery, and future research should prioritise frailty-specific, mobility-centred outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.