ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strict Recursive Closed-Loop Evaluation of Greenhouse Air Temperature Forecasting with Generated Exogenous Variables and Exogenous-Error Propagation Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate multi-horizon forecasting of greenhouse air temperature is essential for sensor-based environmental monitoring and control-oriented decision support. However, conventional evaluation methods often rely on open-loop or semi-closed-loop settings, where future observations may be unavailable during practical deployment. This study established a strict recursive closed-loop forecasting protocol and an exogenous-error propagation analysis framework using multi-source environmental sensing data. A Liquid Neural Network (LNN) was developed as a continuous-time forecasting model and compared with long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) under consistent data conditions. During inference, future greenhouse air temperature and exogenous variables were not observed but recursively generated through predicted-temperature feedback and exogenous-variable forecasting. Across 10 repeated runs, the LNN achieved the lowest one-step prediction error, with a mean absolute error of 0.4771 °C and root mean square error of 0.5996 °C. However, under strict recursive closed-loop forecasting, LSTM showed the lowest errors at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h horizons, indicating stronger long-horizon stability. Ablation experiments demonstrated that using observed future exogenous variables underestimated forecasting errors, while exogenous-error analysis identified outdoor temperature and solar radiation as the dominant sources of propagated uncertainty. These results highlight the importance of evaluating greenhouse air temperature forecasting under realistic recursive conditions by considering both model stability and future input uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.