Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Step Count as a Digital Mobility Outcome-A Pilot Study on Differences Between the Upper and Lower Extremities.
Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFractures of the lower extremity are commonly associated with impaired mobility, whereas injuries of the upper extremity primarily affect limb-specific function. Wearable devices allow the objective and continuous monitoring of physical activity and may therefore provide additional insight into postoperative recovery processes under real-world conditions. This exploratory study aimed to compare postoperative trajectories of daily step count following surgical treatment of upper versus lower extremity fractures and to explore possible associations with general health status and return to work.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, 38 patients with upper extremity fractures and 55 patients with lower extremity fractures were included. Daily step counts were recorded postoperatively. Patient-reported general health (PROMIS Global Health) and work status at three months were assessed.
resultsDuring the early postoperative period, patients with lower extremity injuries recorded lower daily step counts than patients with upper extremity injuries. Within three months, 89% of patients with upper extremity injuries and 49% of patients with lower extremity injuries had returned to work.
conclusionsIn this exploratory cohort, postoperative step count trajectories differed between surgically treated upper and lower extremity fractures during the early postoperative period. Return-to-work rates at three months also differed between groups. Interpretation of these findings is limited by the real-world use of heterogeneous consumer wearable devices and the exploratory study design. These findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.