ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ex Vivo Differentiation of Cartilage Degeneration Severity and Subchondral Bone Using Vibroacoustic Signals from Instrument-Tissue Interaction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is characterized by cartilage matrix degeneration, which eventually leads to joint dysfunction and surgical replacement. Preoperative radiography, the standard for treatment decision making, provides limited information on the extent of degeneration, emphasizing the need for quantitative intraoperative techniques. This study evaluates the potential of vibroacoustic signals generated from instrument-tissue interactions to assess cartilage degeneration severity. A total of 136 ex vivo cartilage specimens of varying degeneration severity, histologically graded using the OARSI score, were collected from 41 patients undergoing arthroplasty. The specimens were classified into three groups: healthy cartilage (OARSI ≤2.0), degenerated cartilage (OARSI ≥ 2.5), and subchondral bone. Vibroacoustic signals were captured during specimen palpation using a vibration measurement system affixed to a surgical probe. 26 characteristic signal features were extracted using Continuous-Wavelet Transformation, and their discriminative power was assessed using Support Vector Machine and k-Nearest-Neighbor classifiers under patient- and specimen-level grouped cross-validation with nested hyperparameter tuning. Bone was distinguished from cartilage with 84-91% recall. Healthy cartilage (OARSI ≤2.0) was identifiable with 74-80% sensitivity, whereas the specificity for degenerated cartilage (OARSI ≥ 2.5) remained limited (40-57%), constituting the principal limitation of the approach. Interpreting the binary cartilage classification as a diagnostic test, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of up to 0.66 (95% CI [0.56, 0.76]). The study demonstrates that vibroacoustic signals from instrument-tissue interactions may provide complementary information for intraoperative cartilage evaluation and may contribute to decision making in arthroplasty, while the reliable grading of cartilage degeneration remains an open challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.