ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
How Stable Are Temporal EMG Parameters in Rowing? A Seven-Day Test-Retest Reliability Study Using Wearable sEMG.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG), increasingly delivered through wireless wearable systems, is a key non-invasive tool for the objective monitoring of muscle activation during repetitive motor tasks. The clinical and longitudinal usefulness of wearable sEMG during rowing depends on the test-retest reliability of the parameters extracted from the signal during high-intensity, multi-muscle cyclic locomotor tasks. This study aimed to use advanced sEMG processing to quantify the between-session reliability of EMG-derived parameters (onset, offset, active duration, and peak position) across seven major muscles, to characterize the between-session similarity of ensemble-averaged activation waveforms, and to describe within-trial activation dynamics. Fifteen competitive rowers (10 males, five females; aged 14-22 years) performed two identical 2000 m all-out trials seven days apart, with sEMG recorded by a wireless wearable system. Reliability was assessed by ICC(A,1) with 95% CIs, SEM, MDC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.