ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
Real-World Experience with Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Severe Refractory Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with limited treatment options for patients with severe, treatment-refractory disease. The JAK-STAT pathway represents a potential therapeutic target, although real-world evidence for JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in HS remains limited. This retrospective case series describes eight male patients with Hurley stage III HS who received tofacitinib (n=3), upadacitinib (n=4), or ivarmacitinib (n=1) after inadequate response to conventional therapies. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain at the latest available follow-up. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 12 months. Seven patients showed improvement in inflammatory lesions and/or pain, whereas one patient receiving tofacitinib showed limited clinical benefit. The median reduction in IHS4 score was 9.5 points (range, 2-18), and the median reduction in NRS pain score was 4.0 points (range, 0-5). Temporary interruption of upadacitinib in one patient was followed by disease flare, with improvement again observed after treatment re-initiation. No severe infections, thromboembolic events, HBV reactivation, or treatment-limiting adverse events were identified during the available follow-up. These preliminary observations suggest that JAKi may have a potential role in selected patients with severe, treatment-refractory HS. However, responses and follow-up durations were heterogeneous, and the small sample size precludes comparisons between agents. Prospective controlled studies with standardized assessment timepoints and longer follow-up are needed to clarify efficacy, durability, and long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.