ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Case Report: Zilucoplan in refractory myasthenic crisis and its prodromal stages: a novel therapeutic perspective.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenic crisis (MC) represents life-threatening respiratory failure in myasthenia gravis (MG), while impending myasthenic crisis (iMC) denotes rapidly worsening weakness threatening ventilation however the condition is reversible with timely intervention. Complement inhibition has emerged as a targeted approach for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG. To date, evidence for Zilucoplan, a subcutaneous macrocyclic peptide C5 inhibitor, in acute settings remains limited. This study describes two Italian AChR-positive-MG patients experiencing severe, treatment-refractory exacerbations. One patient presented with overt MC requiring non-invasive ventilation, and the second with iMC and rapidly worsening bulbar dysfunction. Both patients received Zilucoplan 32.4 mg/day subcutaneously following failure of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and, in one case, multiple biologic agents. Zilucoplan provided rapid, robust, and durable improvement in refractory AChR-positive MG during both MC and iMC. Both patients maintained sustained remission with no adverse events under ongoing Zilucoplan therapy. Continuous complement blockade and easy-to-use subcutaneous administration may offer significant advantages for acute rescue and maintenance therapy. Early initiation could prevent progression from iMC to established MC. Larger prospective studies are warranted to define optimal use and timing of Zilucoplan in MG crisis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.