ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026
Development and multicenter external validation of a deep learning model for early screening of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum on routine chest radiographs.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF) is frequently underrecognized in its early stage because radiographic abnormalities on routine chest radiographs are often subtle. We aimed to develop and externally validate a deep learning model for opportunistic screening of TOLF using routine chest radiographs. Methods: This retrospective multicenter diagnostic study included an internal development cohort from Changzheng Hospital and an independent external validation cohort from South China Hospital. The internal cohort comprised 250 patients with TOLF and 250 control subjects collected between January 2017 and January 2023. The external cohort comprised 150 patients with TOLF and 150 control subjects. TOLF status was established on CT using predefined radiological criteria, whereas frontal and lateral chest radiographs were used only as model inputs. We evaluated multiple backbone architectures, including ResNet101, DenseNet169, Vision Transformer, and Swin Transformer, and additionally explored three dual-view fusion strategies. Model development was performed using 10-fold cross-validation in the internal cohort, and performance was summarized using bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. Human-reader comparison was conducted in the internal cohort. Results: In backbone screening within the internal cohort, ResNet101 emerged as the best-performing architecture. After subsequent input-resolution optimization, the final lateral-view ResNet101 model achieved an accuracy of 97.0%, sensitivity of 94.0%, specificity of 100.0%, and an AUC of 0.970. None of the evaluated dual-view fusion strategies outperformed the best single lateral-view model, and the poorer performance of posterior-fusion models was mainly attributable to reduced sensitivity. Compared with experienced spine surgeons and imaging physicians, the internal ResNet101 model showed significantly higher sensitivity and overall accuracy (both Conclusion: A deep learning model based on routine chest radiographs may provide accurate and generalizable screening for TOLF across institutions. The lateral-view model showed the most consistent diagnostic performance, supporting its potential role as an opportunistic screening tool to prompt confirmatory CT evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.