ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Convolutional neural networks in brain disease diagnosis: a unified review of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and brain tumor classification.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological and neuro-oncological brain disorders like Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and brain tumors are challenging to diagnose due to overlapping symptoms and the limitations of conventional imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has emerged as a powerful approach, enabling automated and high-precision detection and staging. This review critically integrates recent developments in CNN architectures, such as hybrid models, attention mechanisms, and 3D CNNs for MRI-based diagnosis of these disorders. It further examines preprocessing methods, datasets, and performance metrics across studies, with emphasis on innovations such as transformer-based models and lightweight architectures. While CNNs show impressive accuracy, issues remain in generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration. This review highlights the need for multimodal data fusion, explainable artificial intelligence, and real-world validation to narrow the gap between research and clinical practice. By defining future directions, this review aims to guide the development of robust, scalable neurodiagnostic systems for early intervention and better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.