ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Parental involvement in zero-separation care: experiences and needs of parents of late preterm infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study explores parents' experiences regarding involvement in the care of their late preterm infants within a zero-separation care model at the semi-intensive care unit (level II) of the University Hospitals Leuven. Methods: A qualitative design was used, employing in-depth, semi-structured interviews with thirteen parents of late preterm infants recruited between February and September 2025. Data were analyzed using the QUAGOL method and guided by the COREQ framework. Results: Three overarching themes emerged: Stay at the unit, parental role, and needs regarding involvement in care. Parents described the zero-separation model as highly beneficial for bonding and caregiving, particularly through continuous presence. Over time, routines became familiar and their parental confidence grew. Challenges included inconsistent professional guidance on feeding and unclear communication about medical decisions such as feeding tube placement. Parents appreciated being actively involved in caregiving and valued hands-on coaching. Fathers emphasized their dual supportive role, though some felt overlooked. During prolonged hospital stays, parents experienced intertwined emotional, physical, and social needs, including reassurance, rest, and social connection. Conclusion: Zero-separation care shows strong potential to enhance bonding, strengthen parental confidence, and foster collaborative family-centered care. Clear and supportive communication, structured guidance, and supportive bedside coaching are essential in meeting parents' evolving needs and to promote parental engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.