ArticleGland surgery2026
Development and frontier trends of pancreaticojejunostomy over the past 26 years: bibliometric and visual analysis.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite continuous advancements in pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) techniques, there remains a lack of unified clinical guidelines for anastomosis selection. To date, bibliometric analysis has not yet been applied to systematically characterize the global development of PJ research. Accordingly, this study aimed to perform comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis to clarify the developmental trajectory, research hotspots and emerging frontiers. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) for English-language original research and reviews on PJ published from January 1, 2000, to May 1, 2026. Bibliometric and visual analyses were performed using CiteSpace 6.4 R1, VOSviewer 1.6.20, Bibliometrix 4.1, and Scimago Graphica to characterize publication trends, research collaboration networks (country, institution, author), journal distribution, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and citation burst characteristics. Results: A total of 3,329 eligible studies were included. PJ-related publications showed a continuous upward trend with a marked surge over the past 26 years. Japan, the United States and China were the most prolific countries. The United States, Italy, and Germany exhibited stronger international collaboration and higher citation impact. Zhejiang University, Sichuan University, and the University of Verona were the leading contributing institutions, with the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Pittsburgh, and Mayo Clinic emerging as core nodes in the global collaboration network. The largest author collaboration cluster was led by Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia, and Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona). Conclusions: PJ research has experienced progressive development from technical exploration to standardized norms and further to precision innovation over the past 26 years, with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) prevention and management as the enduring core theme. International cooperation, technological innovation, and interdisciplinary integration are the key driving forces for PJ development. Future PJ research should focus on strengthening international multicenter collaboration, developing personalized risk assessment strategies, advancing robot-assisted anastomotic techniques, and promoting the popularization of advanced PJ technologies in resource-limited regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.