ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026
Analysis of the safety and efficacy of single-stage spinal cord stimulation implantation under general anesthesia for high-risk diabetic feet.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of a one-stage spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system under general anesthesia in patients with high-risk diabetic feet. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 25 patients who were diagnosed with high-risk diabetic feet and who underwent implantation of an SCS system between January 2023 and May 2024. The procedure was conducted under general anesthesia with intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring. All patients were followed up for one year postoperatively. The outcomes, including pain intensity, foot skin temperature, dorsalis pedis artery flow velocity, and F-wave occurrence rate on electromyography, were assessed at baseline and at multiple time points after surgery. Additionally, postoperative complications such as infection, electrode displacement, and lead fracture, as well as rates of new ulcer formation, amputation, and mortality, were recorded. Results: All patients completed the 12-month follow-up period. The efficacy rate was 100% at 7 days postoperatively and 88% at 6 months, and the incidence of new ulcers at 1 year was 8%. Significant improvements in pain, foot skin temperature, and arterial flow velocity were observed within 7 days after implantation ( Conclusion: One-stage implantation of an SCS system under general anesthesia is safe and effective for managing high-risk diabetic feet. The system significantly alleviates pain, improves lower extremity perfusion, and enhances nerve conduction function. Notably, while vascular improvements occur rapidly, neurological recovery may require a longer duration of stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.