ReviewAntibody therapeutics2026
Subcutaneous administration of antibody-drug conjugates: current challenges, emerging opportunities, and future perspectives.
Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly growing class of targeted therapeutics designed to deliver potent payloads while minimizing systemic toxicity. Despite significant progress, all approved ADCs are administered intravenously (IV). In contrast, subcutaneous (SC) delivery is well established for antibodies, offering shorter administration time, improved convenience, and the potential for outpatient or home-based treatment. Extending SC delivery to ADCs is therefore attractive but introduces unique challenges related to structural complexity, linker-payload instability, and cytotoxic payloads. This review evaluates the feasibility of subcutaneously administered ADCs by integrating insights from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, emerging clinical data, and advances in molecular design, formulation, and delivery technologies. Key challenges include limited clinical comparisons between IV and SC routes, uncertain bioavailability and tumor exposure, linker-payload instability, injection-site reactions, and high-concentration formulation constraints. Enabling strategies, such as rational molecular design, hyaluronidase-enabled delivery, polymer-based systems, and conversion of IV ADCs to SC dosing, are discussed. Recent advances, exemplified by JSKN033, demonstrate the feasibility of high-concentration liquid co-formulation approaches for SC administration and may represent a future direction. Evidence across oncology and non-oncology programs suggests that while SC delivery is achievable, success is highly molecule dependent. Overall, transitioning ADCs from IV to SC requires case-by-case evaluation and coordinated innovation across rational molecular design, formulation, and nonclinical and clinical development to realize the full patient-centric benefits of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.