ReviewSensors & diagnostics2026
Noninvasive malaria detection beyond blood sampling.
Review in Sensors & diagnostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria remains a major global health challenge, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, despite being one of the oldest documented human diseases. Although blood-based detection remains the mainstream diagnostic modality, its use is constrained by the need for trained personnel, sterile procedures, patient discomfort, and reduced sensitivity for low-parasitemia and asymptomatic infections. Recent advances in sensing and diagnostics, increasingly integrated with machine learning and artificial intelligence, have created new opportunities for noninvasive malaria detection using accessible biological samples and physiological signals. This critical review synthesizes recent progress in noninvasive malaria detection across nonblood sampling matrices, biophysical detection mechanisms, and data-driven analytical approaches. We examine diverse sampling matrices, including urine, saliva, exhaled breath, and skin-emitted volatile organic compounds with attention to their associated biomarkers, biological relevance, and operational feasibility. We further categorize detection technologies into three principal domains: biological sample-based platforms, including immunoassays, molecular amplification, biosensors, and mass spectrometry; acoustic, photoacoustic, and optical systems, including ultrasound, photoacoustics, optical imaging, and spectroscopy; and digital and connected health platforms, including wearable monitoring, smartphone imaging, and machine learning-enabled analysis. We then compare these modalities in terms of analytical performance, operational suitability, and translational potential for integration into healthcare systems. Finally, we present an implementation-oriented roadmap that highlights translational, equity, artificial intelligence, scalability, and regulatory considerations, identifying practical paths toward field-ready, affordable, and programmatically relevant noninvasive malaria detection.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.