ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Adjunctive Biophysical Stimulation for Bone Regeneration Across Distraction Osteogenesis, Limb Reconstruction, and Delayed Union.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Impaired bone regeneration remains a major challenge in orthopedic reconstruction, particularly in distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, and delayed union, where prolonged healing increases treatment burden and complication risk. Adjunctive biophysical stimulation, including low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation, has been investigated as a noninvasive strategy to improve bone-healing outcomes, but evidence in reconstructive orthopedic settings remains limited and heterogeneous. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to March 21, 2026. Eligible studies evaluated adjunctive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound or pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, or delayed union using comparative control groups. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for clinically comparable outcomes. Fixation-normalized healing outcomes were pooled as mean differences, radiographic healing outcomes as standardized mean differences, and methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria for qualitative synthesis. Two studies contributed to quantitative pooling of fixation-normalized healing efficiency, demonstrating significantly shorter healing duration with adjunctive intervention compared with control (mean difference, -16.78 days/cm; 95% CI, -22.72 to -10.83; P < 0.001; I² = 0%). Three studies contributed to radiographic meta-analysis, showing a significant benefit favoring adjunctive biophysical stimulation (SMD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.07-0.74; P = 0.02; I² = 42.1%). Secondary clinical burden and safety outcomes were not suitable for quantitative pooling because of heterogeneous reporting. Six studies were judged as having some concerns and one as high risk of bias. Conclusions: Adjunctive biophysical stimulation was associated with favorable healing-related outcomes in selected distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, and delayed-union settings. However, the evidence base remains limited by small study numbers, methodological heterogeneity, and inconsistent outcome reporting, supporting the need for larger contemporary randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.