Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592349›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Adjunctive Biophysical Stimulation for Bone Regeneration Across Distraction Osteogenesis, Limb Reconstruction, and Delayed Union.

Mohammed M Tarabishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed M TarabishiReconstructive Orthopaedic Department King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Impaired bone regeneration remains a major challenge in orthopedic reconstruction, particularly in distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, and delayed union, where prolonged healing increases treatment burden and complication risk. Adjunctive biophysical stimulation, including low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation, has been investigated as a noninvasive strategy to improve bone-healing outcomes, but evidence in reconstructive orthopedic settings remains limited and heterogeneous. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to March 21, 2026. Eligible studies evaluated adjunctive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound or pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, or delayed union using comparative control groups. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for clinically comparable outcomes. Fixation-normalized healing outcomes were pooled as mean differences, radiographic healing outcomes as standardized mean differences, and methodological quality was assessed using RoB 2. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria for qualitative synthesis. Two studies contributed to quantitative pooling of fixation-normalized healing efficiency, demonstrating significantly shorter healing duration with adjunctive intervention compared with control (mean difference, -16.78 days/cm; 95% CI, -22.72 to -10.83; P < 0.001; I² = 0%). Three studies contributed to radiographic meta-analysis, showing a significant benefit favoring adjunctive biophysical stimulation (SMD, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.07-0.74; P = 0.02; I² = 42.1%). Secondary clinical burden and safety outcomes were not suitable for quantitative pooling because of heterogeneous reporting. Six studies were judged as having some concerns and one as high risk of bias. Conclusions: Adjunctive biophysical stimulation was associated with favorable healing-related outcomes in selected distraction osteogenesis, limb reconstruction, and delayed-union settings. However, the evidence base remains limited by small study numbers, methodological heterogeneity, and inconsistent outcome reporting, supporting the need for larger contemporary randomized trials.

Indexed as

Adjunctive biophysical stimulationbone regenerationdelayed uniondistraction osteogenesislimb reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42592349
PMCPMC13464719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.