Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42593402›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2026

Detection of biofilms on explanted urinary incontinence slings and their relationship with pain, exposure, or urinary tract complications.

Nazish Abbas, Thomas Willmott, Paul M Campbell, Gurdeep Singh, Maya Basu, Fiona Reid, Cecile El Chami, Andrew J McBain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nazish AbbasDivision of Developmental Biology & Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1267-8049
Thomas WillmottDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3700-5986
Paul M CampbellDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5912-6095
Gurdeep SinghLydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-672X
Maya BasuDivision of Developmental Biology & Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-8715
Fiona ReidManchester Academic Health Science Centre, Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-7948
Cecile El ChamiDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0468-6305
Andrew J McBainDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5255-5425

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midurethral slings (MUS) are synthetic mesh implants used to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Positioned via retropubic or transobturator approaches, they support the mid-urethra to maintain closure during increases in intra-abdominal pressure. Although generally effective, long-term MUS complications have been associated with chronic inflammation, pain, and infection, with explanted slings often showing bacterial colonization. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, particularly the role of microbial biofilms. We examined the presence and characteristics of biofilms on MUS removed for various complications to better inform clinical management. MUS samples ( IMPORTANCE: Biofilms are common on explanted midurethral slings, but their volume does not predict complications. These findings suggest that bacterial composition and host response, rather than bacterial load, drive mesh-related morbidity. Understanding these factors may improve mesh design and guide strategies to prevent infection and chronic complications.

Indexed as

BiofilmsPainSuburethral SlingsUrinary Tract InfectionsFemaleHumansMicroscopy, Confocalbiofilmsconfocal microscopyfluorescence in situ hybridisationimplant-associated infection

Identifiers

PMID42593402
PMCPMC13599481

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.