ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Physics-Informed Reconstruction of Transmural Myocardial Deformation from 3D Echocardiography: Validation Against Cardiac MRI.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative assessment of myocardial deformation is increasingly important in clinical cardiology, yet conventional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography and standard three-dimensional (3D) approaches remain limited by out-of-plane motion and incomplete characterization of transmural mechanics. To address these limitations, we introduce a physics-informed framework for 3D echocardiography that reconstructs the full finite strain tensor across the entire myocardial wall. As an initial methodological study, we demonstrate the framework and validate it against cardiac magnetic resonance in a small cohort.
methodsEndocardial and epicardial surfaces were segmented from 3D echocardiographic datasets and tracked throughout the cardiac cycle using speckle-tracking techniques. An optimization framework with a soft volumetric penalty was implemented, permitting volume change at finite cost while maintaining tracking fidelity and geometric smoothness. The resulting deformation field enabled reconstruction of the complete 3D strain tensor. Global strain measurements derived from the method were validated against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements obtained in two subjects.
resultsGlobal longitudinal and circumferential strain values obtained from the proposed framework showed strong agreement with CMR measurements. The optimization procedure also demonstrated robustness to segmentation variability and reduced errors associated with epicardial tracking. Beyond conventional strain indices, the method enabled reconstruction of spatially resolved principal strain fields throughout the ventricular wall, revealing physiologically consistent transmural gradients and contraction patterns.
conclusionPhysics-informed integration of speckle tracking with biomechanical constraints enables robust reconstruction of 3D myocardial deformation from echocardiography. This framework provides a comprehensive and physically consistent characterization of myocardial mechanics from widely available 3D echocardiographic data. These initial results support the feasibility of the proposed framework and motivate future evaluation in larger, more diverse patient cohorts to establish its clinical reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.