Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42594346›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Exploring Perceptions of Leveraging AI to Improve Outcomes in Maternal, Sexual, and Reproductive Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Exploratory Qualitative Study.

Rachel King, Elizabeth Oseku, Cecilia Akatukwasa, Moreen Nanyonjo, Joshua Beinomugisha, Joan Akullo, Jackie Ssemata, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel KingDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th St., Floor 3, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States, 1 415-476-5494.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0085-3498
Elizabeth OsekuAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-3787
Cecilia AkatukwasaAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-9797
Moreen NanyonjoAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8492-6479
Joshua BeinomugishaAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-2191
Joan AkulloAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1802-434X
Jackie SsemataAcademy for Health Innovations, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7457-5747
Rosalind Parkes-RatanshiSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-1311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: AI has the potential to transform health care in low- and middle-income countries, where access to quality care remains limited. Maternal, sexual, and reproductive health (MSRH) outcomes are especially poor due to resource shortages, financial barriers, and geographic inequities. With thoughtful implementation, AI could help address these gaps through innovations in diagnostics, health education chatbots, and telemedicine. However, responsible use is essential to ensure AI reduces, rather than exacerbates, health disparities between high- and low-income regions. Objective: Our study examines the perceptions, uses, benefits, and challenges of AI in MSRH among medical professionals, community members, and AI experts, guided by the diffusion of innovations theory. Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study involving a round table discussion, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and stakeholder meetings, to examine the perceptions of health workers, policymakers, AI researchers and implementers, as well as Community Advisory Board members. We explored the opportunities, risks, limitations, and best practices for responsible AI in MSRH in sub-Saharan Africa. Framework analysis was used to analyze the collected data, and 3 member-check sessions were conducted to verify the accuracy of the findings. Finally, the themes derived from the data were mapped onto the diffusion of innovations theory to guide reporting of the study findings. Results: The study recruited 59 participants (35 male and 24 female), across the different data collection methods: round table discussion (16 participants), key informant interviews (10 participants), focus group discussions (7 participants), and stakeholder meetings (26 participants). We found a widespread lack of understanding and awareness of AI among both health workers and the general community. Among participants who shared their perspectives, 2 overarching themes emerged around the current and potential uses of AI innovations: filling gaps when skilled and experienced health personnel are not consistently available and targeting high-priority health activities or patients. Participants also emphasized several critical considerations. Building trust among health care providers, patients, and the broader community was seen as essential, alongside addressing language and cultural diversity, both of which require deliberate capacity strengthening. Ensuring equity and sustainability through cocreation strategies was equally stressed. Key concerns raised included ethics, cost, health literacy, and data biases. Conclusions: Our findings will inform the development of a continent-wide AI hub for MSRH, highlighting barriers and opportunities for improving health care access. We aim to support policymakers, researchers, and implementers in using AI to promote equitable maternal, sexual, and reproductive health care delivery across Africa.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMaternal HealthReproductive HealthSexual HealthAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchAIartificial intelligencematernal healthreproductive healthsexual healthsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID42594346
PMCPMC13472523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.