ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Formative Work to Guide Implementation of an Evidence-Based Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Behavioral Health Program in Clinics: Qualitative Study Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Salud en Mis Manos (SEMM) is a community health worker-delivered evidence-based intervention shown to increase breast and cervical cancer screening in medically underserved Latinas. Despite SEMM's success in community-based settings, clinic-based implementation is limited. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors influencing the implementation of SEMM in clinic settings using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform and refine implementation strategy development. Methods: We developed theory-informed (eg, CFIR, Social Cognitive Theory, and Readiness) interview guides to elicit barriers and facilitators of SEMM clinic implementation. We conducted 12 semistructured interviews with clinic leaders, outreach coordinators, and community health workers from 4 Texas health centers serving low-income Latinas. Transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis and CFIR. Results: Barriers and facilitators fell within 17 constructs of the 5 CFIR domains. Across all interview participants, key facilitators fell within intervention characteristics (eg, SEMM addresses community needs), inner setting (eg, clinic staff buy-in can facilitate SEMM implementation), and outer setting (eg, established partnerships may leverage SEMM uptake) domains. Barriers were inner setting (eg, limited time and clinic staff capacity may limit SEMM implementation) and intervention characteristics (eg, challenges with SEMM training duration and content). Conclusions: CFIR, a theory-based systematic approach, enabled key stakeholder-identified barriers and facilitators to SEMM clinic implementation. These factors help identify implementation support strategies distinct from prior community-based implementation efforts. Findings (part of the initial steps of the Implementation Mapping protocol for strategy development) refined the design of a multifaceted implementation strategy to support SEMM clinic uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.