ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Construction of an associative model for prolonged intensive care unit stay in sepsis patients combined with myocardial injury.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify the factors contributing to Prolonged Length of Stay (PLOS) in intensive care units for sepsis patients combined with Myocardial Injury (MI) and to construct an associative model.
methodsData were from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Variables were selected using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis. The performance of five Machine Learning (ML) models established based on key factors, including the Logistic model, XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and RandomForest, was compared by 10-fold nested cross-validation. The optimal associative model performance was validated by 10-fold cross-validation repeated 5-times.
resultsAmong 1792 sepsis patients combined with MI, 448 patients developed PLOS. LASSO regression analysis indicated that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, potassium, age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, red blood cell, acute kidney injury, vasopressor, mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy might be factors related to PLOS. Combining the results of 10-fold nested cross-validation, the Logistic model, which included the 10 variables, was more stable than the other four ML models. The mean Area Under the Curves (AUCs) for the training and validation sets by 10-fold cross-validation repeated 5-times were 0.852 (0.849‒0.856) and 0.848 (0.837‒0.857). The AUC of the test set was 0.846 (0.796‒0.890).
conclusionPLOS in sepsis patients combined with MI involved multiple influences. Early identification of high-risk factors and intensive multidisciplinary treatment can help to shorten LOS and reduce the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.