ArticleSpinal cord2026
Impact of respiratory muscle training on sleep disordered breathing in people with tetraplegia: a sub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designSub-analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
objectivesRespiratory muscle training (RMT) in people with tetraplegia yields marked improvements in inspiratory muscle strength. The present study investigated whether RMT also modifies sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and daytime sleepiness.
settingIndependent research institute in Sydney, Australia.
methodsSixty-two adults with tetraplegia underwent six weeks of supervised RMT. The active-RMT group trained the respiratory muscles through progressive threshold loading to a mean intensity of 50% maximal inspiratory pressure whereas the sham-RMT group experienced the same training protocol, but their device had no progressive threshold load. Primary measures of SDB were obtained using level II ambulatory polysomnograms and daytime sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at baseline and after 6-weeks RMT.
resultsForty-eight participants completed two home-based polysomnograms. Maximal inspiratory pressure (primary outcome) increased more after active intervention than sham, between-group difference 11.8cmH
conclusionsDespite significant increases in inspiratory muscle strength, 6 weeks of supervised respiratory muscle training at a mean intensity of 50% maximal inspiratory pressure does not reduce SDB or daytime sleepiness in people with tetraplegia and severe SDB.
Identifiers
42595897What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.