Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42595955›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026

Contemporary Management of Aortic Stenosis: Timing of Intervention and Lifetime Valve Management.

Ottavia Cozzi, Thomas Pilgrim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ottavia CozziDepartment of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-1781
Thomas PilgrimDepartment of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-4068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcific aortic stenosis (AS) is the most relevant valvular heart disease in aging populations and remains both underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening studies reveal a high prevalence of unrecognized disease, while up to 40% of patients with symptomatic severe AS do not undergo valve intervention, resulting in poor survival. No pharmacologic therapy has yet altered disease progression, although targeted approaches such as lipoprotein(a) inhibition are under investigation.

methodsThis paper provides a comprehensive perspective review of the evolving epidemiology, timing of intervention, and long-term management of aortic stenosis, drawing on randomized trials and contemporary clinical data.

resultsRandomized trials have challenged the traditional watchful waiting strategy in asymptomatic severe AS, showing that early aortic valve replacement (AVR) reduces cardiovascular events, though survival benefit depends on patient selection and timing. Moderate AS is increasingly recognized as a high-risk condition, prompting ongoing trials evaluating earlier intervention. As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands to younger, lower-risk patients, long-term issues-including conduction disturbances, paravalvular leak, cerebrovascular events, valve hemodynamics and durability, and redo feasibility-become central to care. Contemporary data suggest comparable mid-term durability between TAVI and surgery, but lifetime management planning is essential.

conclusionsOptimal care of aortic stenosis requires earlier diagnosis, optimized procedural strategies, and a lifetime-oriented approach to management, supported by continued investigation into pharmacologic therapy and the timing of intervention.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCalcinosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID42595955
PMCPMC13473407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.