ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2026
A Closed-Loop Cardiovascular Model of the Supine-To-Stand Manoeuvre: Implications for Falls.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of falling increases with age and orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common cardiovascular contributor. Current OH diagnostics rely on intermittent blood pressure measurements, which may not adequately characterise haemodynamic responses during orthostatic stress. We developed a closed-loop cardiovascular lumped-parameter model and fitting pipeline for continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate data during a supine-to-stand manoeuvre, enabling model-based evaluation of orthostatic haemodynamic responses in older adults. Our 23-compartment lumped model included baroreflex and cardiopulmonary reflex regulation and was calibrated using Finapres data from older adults (Nijmegen Radboud University PROHEALTH study). Using a stochastic ranking evolutionary strategy, we fitted 31 parameters to averaged cohort data, classifying participants as with or without a history of falls (≥ 1 fall in the previous year). The model reproduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate responses at the population level, with normalised root mean squared errors of 10.6% and 9.6% for participants with and without a history of falls, respectively. Four model parameters differed significantly between the two population-average fits: baroreflex reference heart rate, a baroreflex transfer function parameter, transient external muscle pressure during standing, and total blood volume. These results demonstrate that a physiologically structured cardiovascular model can reproduce population-level orthostatic responses in older adults and highlight model-based parameter differences associated with fall history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.