Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42596918›Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

A qualitative study exploring postpartum patients' experiences with remote blood pressure monitoring.

Sameepya Thatipelli, Deborah L Pestka, Kate Honeyfield, Sydney Hansen, Rubina Rizvi, Genevieve B Melton, Bethany A Sabol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sameepya ThatipelliUniversity of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5035-583X
Deborah L PestkaCenter for Learning Health System Sciences University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-1991
Kate HoneyfieldUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Denver Colorado USA.
Sydney HansenDepartment of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Rubina RizviCenter for Learning Health System Sciences University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-3086
Genevieve B MeltonCenter for Learning Health System Sciences University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Bethany A SabolDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women's Health University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3908-7046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a leading and often preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous postpartum remote monitoring programs now exist with varying patient interfaces, functionalities, and levels of nursing/provider support. There remains a paucity of data on the patient experience, particularly regarding their interaction with the technology and program-specific components. Objectives: We sought to understand patient experiences following their participation in our 6-week Home Observation of Postpartum Elevated Blood Pressure (HOPE-BP) monitoring program. HOPE-BP is a provider-supported, nurse-driven program custom-built within our hospital's electronic health record (EHR) system, Epic's MyChart Care Companion. Through collaboration with clinical quality experts and information technology staff, we designed a patient-facing experience that includes twice daily blood pressure tasks, immediate patient feedback on blood pressure values, and a symptom tracker. Study design: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 participants who had graduated from the HOPE-BP program. Interviews were conducted from November 2023 to April 2024 and were recorded and professionally transcribed. The interviews were analyzed and reviewed by two members of the study team. The team developed codes and categories from the data to describe patient experience throughout the duration of the program. Results: Based on the patient interviews, a total of 37 codes were created and organized into the following nine categories: Communication with the team, suggestions for improvement, education, impressions, hospital readmission, interdisciplinary awareness, negative outcomes, positive outcomes, and process of taking blood pressure. Each of these highlighted the patient experience throughout their participation in the 6-week HOPE-BP program. Benefits of the program included increased health awareness and autonomy, fewer clinic visits, and decreased anxiety. The major challenge mentioned by all participants was the difficulty of meeting the program requirement of strict morning and afternoon blood pressure recordings. Conclusions: This qualitative study captured patients' perspectives with a custom-designed postpartum remote blood pressure program with the patient-facing component of the EHR. Their insight provides valuable information for future program improvements and expansion, and may help to inform other providers who plan to design and implement similar remote monitoring programs at their institutions.

Indexed as

patient feedbackpostpartumqualitative methodstelehealth

Identifiers

PMID42596918
PMCPMC13344225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.