ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Postpartum behavioral health screening and engagement among a predominantly Hispanic, Spanish-speaking underserved population.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Behavioral health (BH) screening during the postpartum period is recommended, but screening frequency remains unclear, particularly in underserved populations, where screening is often limited to a single 6-week postpartum visit. This study evaluated the acceptability of different screening schedules and tracked the time to disengagement from postpartum BH screening in a predominantly Hispanic, Spanish-speaking, publicly insured group. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 181 postpartum patients at delivery into three screening protocols to assess depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Patients planning to return to work within 6 months were assigned to the intensive protocol (16 touchpoints over 36 weeks). Others, including unemployed patients and those returning after 6 months, were randomized to the moderate- (8 touchpoints) or high-frequency (10 touchpoints) protocol over 24 weeks. Primary outcomes included compliance (completed assessments), complete adherence (all assessments), attrition (missing ≥3 visits), and time to disengagement (first missed visit). Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction at 12 months. Group differences were explored using nonparametric and categorical tests with Bonferroni adjustments. Time to disengagement was examined with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. Results: Participants were primarily Hispanic (93%), Spanish-speaking (76%), and publicly insured (82%). Compliance was highest in the moderate group (85%), followed by the high-frequency group (84.8%) and the intensive group (71%). Attrition rates were low across all groups, ranging from 10.0% to 15.6%. In exploratory survival analyses, participants assigned to the intensive protocol demonstrated earlier disengagement compared with those in the Moderate and High frequency schedules (HR = 2.1; Conclusion: Extended, multipoint screening for BH symptoms is feasible and highly acceptable in underserved Hispanic populations where retention is challenging. Ongoing screening is vital for detecting unnoticed BH issues and facilitating timely care. This study demonstrates that focusing on screening frequency rather than uptake and adopting flexible, culturally responsive methods can increase postpartum BH engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.