Evidence mapPaperPMID 42597012Full record

ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Continuous glucose monitoring profiles during postpartum glucose tolerance test results among people with gestational diabetes.

Alyssa R Hersh, Alexandra C Gallagher, Lucy Ward, Christian Huertas-Pagán, Monica Rincon, Amy M Valent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alyssa R HershDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-9346
Alexandra C GallagherDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Stanford University Stanford California USA.
Lucy WardOB/GYN Biostatistics Core Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Christian Huertas-PagánDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.
Monica RinconDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-585X
Amy M ValentDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3832-2024

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Current guidance recommends universal screening with a postpartum oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) 4-12 weeks following delivery among pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) to identify or assess risk for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is not currently a tool for screening for T2D among pregnant or postpartum people. Our objective was to assess CGM data during the postpartum OGTT. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a trial that randomized people with GDM to CGM versus capillary blood glucose (CBG). Participants were included if CGM data were available during their OGTT. Our primary outcome was mean glucose during the postpartum OGTT (75 g 2-h challenge), comparing those with dysglycemia on OGTT (fasting ≥100 mg/dL and/or 2-h ≥140 mg/dL) to normal OGTT results. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria for this secondary analysis. Mean CGM glucoses were higher at all time points for those with dysglycemia compared with a normal OGTT result. Among those with dysglycemia, the mean fasting plasma glucose was 104.3 ± 10.5 and the mean 2-h plasma glucose was 129.9 ± 37.5. For those with normal OGTT results, the mean fasting plasma glucose was 89.8 ± 5.2 and the mean 2-h plasma glucose was 103.5 ± 17.9. When stratified by GDM type, mean CGM glucose was similar between groups. Conclusion: In this study, we found that glucose measured by CGM follows the expected curve in response to the postpartum OGTT among individuals with pregnancies complicated by GDM. Those with dysglycemia had higher mean CGM glucose at all time points assessed. Future studies will need to assess the role of CGM in risk stratifying those with dysglycemia postpartum without an OGTT.

Indexed as

continuous glucose monitoringgestational diabetesglucose tolerance testpostpartumpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42597012
PMCPMC13344718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.