ReviewPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Carrier screening in the reproductive setting-Are there medical implications for the heterozygote?-A guide for clinicians.
Review in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carrier screening for genetic conditions performed preconception or during pregnancy allows identification of fetal risk for inherited autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions. The goal is to identify at-risk patients/couples and offer them reproductive options such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, prenatal testing, or targeted newborn testing. Although individuals are expected to be carriers for autosomal recessive conditions, most couples are not carriers of the same condition. The traditional understanding is that carriers do not exhibit symptoms of disease. However, recent studies have shown that there may be clinical implications for medical management of some conditions in the carrier state, especially in the obstetrical setting. One study showed that 9% of patients who underwent large carrier screening panels were carriers for a condition with clinical implications in the heterozygous state. It is estimated that 2.5% of females are heterozygous for a condition that impacts their medical management during pregnancy. Obstetric clinicians who often interpret carrier screen results must be aware of the potential clinical implications and incorporate this information into their counseling and management plans. In this review, we examined three large panethnic, commercially available carrier screening panels that collectively cover 818 genes. We found that 112 (13.7%) of the conditions have definite or strong implications in the carrier state, and another 100 (12.2%) have moderate or limited evidence of implications in the carrier state. Of the identified genes, 19 may have an impact during pregnancy. This information, if used to guide clinicians on conditions that require further counseling and evaluation, may improve outcomes when incorporated into obstetric practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.