ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Paired versus alternate breastfeeding: Does hindmilk become foremilk?
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast milk fat content increases four-fold from foremilk to hindmilk. Within each nursing episode, women may partially feed on both breasts (paired feeding) or nurse from one breast at a feed and the other breast at the next feed (alternate breastfeeding). Despite varied breastfeeding recommendations, there are no well-designed studies that examine milk volume or composition differences with paired versus alternate feeding. We sought to determine the potential nutrient impact of paired versus alternate breastfeeding, and assess if during paired feeding, does "hindmilk become foremilk" at the next feed. Methods: Women ( Results: In First Pumping, Breasts A and B showed parallel increases in milk fat and calorie content. With the Second Pumping, Breast B milk fat demonstrated further increases consistent with the hindmilk of Breast A. Unexpectedly, with the Second Pumping, Breast A foremilk fat content began at levels consistent with Breast A hindmilk, and further increased to values not seen during the First Pumping. Milk calorie content demonstrated identical patterns as milk fat. Milk protein and carbohydrate content did not change from foremilk to hindmilk, nor was there a significant change between the two milk sampling periods. Conclusion: The fat concentration in the Second Pumping of Breast B was essentially equivalent to the hindmilk content of First Pumping of Breast A, suggesting that "hindmilk becomes foremilk" with a paired feeding process. With the refilling of Breast A, it appears that high fat "hindmilk" is produced first with the fat content further increasing from the initial to the final value in Breast A. These findings raise important questions regarding the diurnal, dietary, and hormonal regulation of breast milk fat content and its potential impact on infant growth and nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.