ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Long-term risk prediction of diabetes mellitus using the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy: Insights into test patterns, single abnormal values, and abnormal fasting glucose.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as an abnormal glucose tolerance first diagnosed during pregnancy. The 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), applied exclusively during pregnancy, is used to diagnose GDM. GDM is associated with long-term maternal complications, including the development of diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between various patterns of abnormal OGTT results and the subsequent development of DM, emphasizing the predictive value of both the number and timing of abnormal glucose measurements. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including pregnant individuals who underwent a 100-g OGTT. Participants were followed for up to 11 years after the test. Exclusion criteria encompassed preexisting DM, steroid use, and incomplete OGTT data. Two models were analyzed: the first compared pathological OGTT patterns (≥2 abnormal results) to normal OGTTs (<2 abnormal results), while the second examined DM risk based on the number and timing of the abnormal values (i.e., fasting, 1-, 2-, or 3-h postglucose ingestion). Statistical analyses utilized hazard ratios derived from multivariable Cox regression models, adjusting for relevant variables. Results: Among 7645 participants, 6.4% developed DM during follow-up. Those with a pathological OGTT were older, more obese, and had higher rates of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. During follow-up, 21.6% of people with ≥2 abnormal results developed DM compared to only 4.6% in the group with <2 abnormal results (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-2.23). Compared to those with all four results normal, the HRs for developing DM with one, two, three, or four abnormal results were 3.2 (95% CI 2.54-4.03), 4.89 (95% CI 3.82-6.26), 8.18 (95% CI 6.0-11.16), and 15.46 (95% CI 9.21-25.93), respectively. Among people with only one abnormal result, abnormal fasting glucose showed the highest risk HR = 7.12 (95% CI 5.10-9.94). Conclusion: The study demonstrates the predictive value of the 100-g OGTT for future DM development. Even a single abnormal result, particularly the fasting glucose, significantly increases risk, with risk escalating as additional abnormalities occur. These findings underscore the need for proactive postnatal follow-up and early interventions to mitigate long-term metabolic risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.