Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597392›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

Comparative and dose-response effects of supplementary exercise training on VO

Dongze Li, Fanli Zhou, Xinshu Li, Kong Shibo, Jie Wang, Xinmiao Feng, Jiezhong Wu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongze Li *School of Sports Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Fanli Zhou *Jiangsu Normal University, School of Physical Education, Jiangsu, China.
Xinshu LiSchool of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Kong ShiboSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Jie WangCollege of Physical Education, Henan Agricultural University, Henan, China.
Xinmiao FengChina Wushu School, Beijing Sport University, Haidian, Beijing, China.
Jiezhong WuDepartment of physical education, Fuzhou University, Minhou, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maximal oxygen uptake (VO Methods: Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), Bayesian network meta-regression, and dose-response NMA were conducted. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework. Results: Sixty-one studies were included in the systematic review; 60 contributed to the main NMA and 31 to the dose-response NMA. Five exercise modalities were significantly superior to the active control condition, which consisted of maintaining regular sport-specific training without additional supplementary intervention: blood flow restriction training, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), intermittent hypoxic training, sprint interval training (SIT), and small-sided games (SSG). HIIT and SIT showed the most consistent overall support, although sparse subgroup findings remained exploratory. The dose-response analysis suggested that the modelled significant regions extended across the observed supplementary exercise dose ranges for HIIT, SIT, and SSG. Bayesian network meta-regression showed no clear effect modification by age, baseline VO Conclusions: Given the predominantly low to very low certainty of evidence, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. HIIT and SIT appeared to be the most consistently supported supplementary modalities for improving VO Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261360986, identifier CRD420261360986.

Indexed as

athletesdose-responseexercise trainingmaximal oxygen uptakenetwork meta-analysisVO2max

Identifiers

PMID42597392
PMCPMC13467872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.