ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Determinants of prognosis after reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke and development of a predictive model.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite improvements in recanalization rates with intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, a substantial proportion of patients experience poor functional recovery. Conventional endpoints based solely on the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) may be affected by heterogeneity in baseline functional status. This study used ΔmRS as a directional indicator of functional improvement and developed an admission-based pre-reperfusion model to predict poor functional recovery after reperfusion therapy. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 374 patients with AIS who underwent reperfusion therapy at Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University between October 2023 and December 2024. ΔmRS was calculated as the admission mRS score minus the 3-month mRS score. Patients were classified as having significant functional improvement when ΔmRS was ≥2 and as having non-significant improvement or poor functional recovery when ΔmRS was <2. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. Predictors were selected using LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression, and a nomogram was subsequently developed. Results: Poor functional recovery occurred in 124 of 374 patients (33%). Higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, elevated admission blood glucose level, higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and concomitant atrial fibrillation were independently associated with poor functional recovery. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.832 in the training cohort and 0.799 in the validation cohort, with acceptable calibration and potential net clinical benefit. Discussion: The ΔmRS-based nomogram may provide a preliminary and clinically interpretable tool for early risk stratification in patients with AIS undergoing reperfusion therapy. ΔmRS should be regarded as a complementary rather than replacement outcome measure, and the model requires further validation in larger, multicenter, and external cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.