Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597809›Full record

ArticleDigital health

How digital medicine redefines the landscape of care: Ethical and legal consequences in the case of psychiatry.

Sandra Anna Just, Brita Elvevåg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandra Anna JustDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8833-1805
Brita ElvevågDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Care is central to medical practice. However, care is currently being re-defined due to the computational logic that is central to digital medicine. For those with serious mental illness in psychiatry, the new landscape of care has significant ethical, legal, and phenomenological implications. The obvious and less obvious differences in care between human caregivers and technology warrant reflection. This commentary examines the nature of care in digital medicine through a case study of voice-based chatbots used in the context of mental health. Several recommendations are derived to reconcile human-centered care with risks in digital medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecarechatbotsdigital medicineethicslawphenomenologypsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID42597809
PMCPMC13469523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.