Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42597976›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2026

Current options and recommendations for the treatment of aortic arch diseases.

Tim Berger, Martin Czerny, Stoyan Kondov, Mario Lescan, Maximilian Kreibich, Martin Grabenwöger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tim BergerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin CzernyDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stoyan KondovDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Mario LescanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maximilian KreibichDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin GrabenwögerDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diseases of the aortic arch represent some of the most complex conditions in cardiovascular medicine due to the segment's unique anatomy and its involvement in cerebral perfusion. Although isolated aortic arch pathology is relatively uncommon, the arch is frequently affected as part of more extensive thoracic aortic disease, including aneurysms, acute and chronic aortic dissections as well as penetrating aortic ulcers. The close relationship of the arch to the supra-aortic vessels and adjacent mediastinal structures contributes to the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these conditions and complicates therapeutic decision-making. Methods: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of diseases involving the aortic arch and summarizes contemporary treatment strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on anatomical considerations and classification systems, including the Ishimaru zones and variations in aortic arch morphology, which are essential for standardized reporting and procedural planning. Key pathological entities discussed include aortic arch aneurysms, acute and chronic dissections involving the arch, and residual aortic dissection following repair of type A dissection. Results: Current treatment options encompass guideline-directed medical therapy, open surgical reconstruction, and evolving endovascular approaches. Open aortic arch replacement, often performed with hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, remains the reference standard for patients with acceptable operative risk due to its durability and favorable long-term outcomes. In parallel, technological advances have enabled the development of branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (B-TEVAR) and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F-TEVAR) devices, including both custom-made and off-the-shelf solutions, expanding treatment possibilities for patients at high surgical risk. Conclusions: Careful patient selection based on anatomical characteristics, disease acuity, comorbidities, and institutional expertise is essential to optimize outcomes. Contemporary management of aortic arch disease therefore requires an individualized, multidisciplinary approach integrating both open and endovascular strategies.

Indexed as

Aortic archendovascular arch repairfrozen elephant trunk (FET)total arch repair

Identifiers

PMID42597976
PMCPMC13470921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.