ReviewBiological psychiatry global open science2026
Temporal Dynamics of Reward Dysfunction in Psychiatric Disorders: Memory-Derived Value, Incentive Salience, Hedonic Impact, and Value Updating.
Review in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reward Dysfunction in Time: Toward a Dynamic Psychiatry of Motivation and Pleasure.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reward processing unfolds across time: Prior experiences shape cue valuation and motivation, anticipated rewards bias action selection, reward encounters generate hedonic and evaluative signals, and outcomes update future value representations. Existing accounts have often examined these processes separately. Here, we propose a temporally organized and mechanistically constrained framework for reward dysfunction across psychiatric disorders. The revised framework distinguishes episodic reward memory, cue-outcome learning, stored value representations, model-based prospective simulation, model-free habit learning, incentive salience, anticipatory pleasure, hedonic impact, outcome evaluation, effort valuation, and value updating. We argue that psychiatric disorders are not characterized best by single broken links in a reward cycle but rather by partially overlapping profiles of altered coupling among these processes. Major depressive disorder may involve impaired positive value updating and reduced access to positive reward memories; schizophrenia may involve unstable value representations, impaired effort-cost integration, and reduced model-based use of reward information; bipolar disorder may involve state-dependent reward hypersensitivity and regulatory instability; and addiction may involve cue-triggered incentive salience, habitization, and negative reinforcement. We specify how these profiles can be tested using reinforcement learning, effort-based decision making, memory-guided choice, ecological momentary assessment, and longitudinal paradigms. This framework generates falsifiable predictions and mechanistically informed intervention hypotheses while avoiding one-to-one mappings between diagnoses, symptoms, and neural circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.