Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598300›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026

Context-specific image quality assessment for virtual histologic staining: checklist and guideline.

Fadeel S Khan, Mia K Markey, Umberto E Villa, Alan C Bovik, Matthew C Fox, Brett H Keeling, Jason S Reichenberg, James W Tunnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fadeel S KhanThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3405-8939
Mia K MarkeyThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-4959
Umberto E VillaThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-2559
Alan C BovikThe University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Electrical, Computer & Energy Engineering, Boulder, Colorado, United States.
Matthew C FoxDell Medical School, Division of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Austin, Texas, United States.
Brett H KeelingDell Medical School, Division of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Austin, Texas, United States.
Jason S ReichenbergDell Medical School, Division of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0987-0646
James W TunnellThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0981

Funding

Multimodal confocal microscopy for surgical guidance of skin resectionsR01CA273734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI James W Tunnell · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Virtual staining applies computational methods to transform optical images of biological samples into histology-like representations suitable for interpretation and analysis. Existing methods for evaluating virtual staining often prioritize metrics that do not provide a complete assessment of image quality for a given biomedical or scientific context. Approach: We review existing approaches to conduct image quality assessment (IQA) for virtual staining and identify their limitations. We make the case for context-specific IQA and propose a checklist and guideline for the comprehensive evaluation of image quality of a virtual staining system. Results: We present a context-specific IQA checklist and guideline for virtually stained images that (1) defines a specific context of use (COU), (2) explains the underlying mechanisms as they relate to COU, and (3) provides COU-specific evidence for validation. We build upon existing methods and connect IQA to the underlying imaging methodology and biological truth. Conclusions: The resulting checklist and guideline link engineering evaluation to biomedical utility and aim to enable more reliable development and evaluation of virtual staining systems.

Indexed as

biomedical opticsdeep learningguidelinehistopathologyimage quality assessmentvirtual staining

Identifiers

PMID42598300
PMCPMC13472531

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.