Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598307›Full record

ArticleJournal of technology in behavioral science2026

Exploring barriers to crisis support: Considerations for the design of automated digital safety planning interventions.

Arka Ghosh, Emily Tack, Sarah Popowski, Tanvi Lakhtakia, Theresa Nguyen, David C Mohr, Kimberly A Van Orden, Madhu Reddy, Jonah Meyerhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arka GhoshDivision of Clinical Informatics and Digital Transformation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emily TackSchool of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Sarah PopowskiCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies (CBITs), Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tanvi LakhtakiaDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Theresa NguyenMental Health America, Alexandria, VA, USA.
David C MohrCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies (CBITs), Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kimberly A Van OrdenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Madhu ReddyDepartment of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jonah MeyerhoffCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies (CBITs), Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

mHealth for suicide prevention: Design, development, and feasibility of a scalable SMS-based safety planning interventionK08MH128640 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Jonah Meyerhoff · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH128640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicidal ideation is common among young adults in the United States and represents an important mental health concern. However, formal mental health care utilization remains limited due to attitudinal and structural barriers. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer a promising approach to help-seeking, especially for young adults who prefer self-managing their symptoms. Text messaging-based safety planning interventions can be a scalable approach to seeking help that can mitigate many structural barriers for young adults. We conducted two online focus groups (n=15 each) to understand what prevents young adults from seeking help for their suicidal thoughts and what might prevent them from engaging with a fully automated text messaging-based safety planning intervention. Participants reported barriers to help seeking both within and outside crisis states. Outside crisis states, the major barriers to help seeking include an unwillingness to burden others, inability to verbalize distress, fear of repercussions, stigma, and inconsistency with self-image. During crisis, participants reported difficulty following through with a safety plan. Despite a preference for self-management, participants expressed skepticism towards a fully automated intervention, citing privacy concerns, doubts about effectiveness, and a desire for human support. Understanding these barriers are critical for developing DMHIs that balance autonomy with perceived effectiveness and support.

Indexed as

Safety planning interventionSuicidal thoughts and behaviorsText messaging

Identifiers

PMID42598307
PMCPMC13470603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.