ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Gut microbial biomarkers for major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alterations in the gut microbiota have been associated with a variety of psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the relationship between MDD and gut microbial communities remains incompletely understood. Most previous studies have primarily focused on gut bacteria, with relatively limited attention to other microbial components. Methods: In this study, we analyzed gut microbial profiles from 36 patients with MDD and 36 healthy controls using metagenomic sequencing data. The MaAsLin2 algorithm was applied to identify potential microbial biomarkers associated with MDD. Results: A total of 6 bacterial biomarkers and 7 viral biomarkers were identified. The models based on these features demonstrated strong predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.891 for bacteria and 0.878 for viruses. Notably, the combined bacterial-viral model achieved an AUC of 0.946. These findings were further evaluated through external testing in two unrelated research cohorts. In the Shanxi cohort, the AUC values were 0.825 (bacteria), 0.803 (viruses), and 0.972 (combined model). In the Wuhan cohort, the AUC values were 0.683 (bacteria), 0.693 (viruses), and 0.784 (combined model). Conclusion: In summary, our results highlight the potential of gut bacterial and viral biomarkers as candidate biomarkers and potential auxiliary tools for MDD assessment and suggest that integrating multi-domain microbial features may improve prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.